ICYMI: Best Practices for PICC insertion, care and management

A multi-specialty panel led by Vineet Chopra, MD, of the University of Michigan in Ann Arbor,  has designed a best practices guide for the “insertion, care, and management” of peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs). The 15-member panel included physicians and nurses from multiple specialties, including pharmacy. A patient was also invited to contribute to panel discussions. Multiple databases were searched for studies and guidelines concerning PICC use from November 2012 to July 2013.

The researchers selected 665 clinical scenarios and 391 unique indications for PICCs and VADs that would represent the decision-making process concerning peripheral intravenous catheters, ultrasonography-guided peripheral intravenous catheters, midline catheters, nontunneled CVCs, tunneled CVCs, and ports. They were all compared with PICCs.

The researchers generated four charts to track appropriate/inappropriate use by VAD device type and duration of infusate.

VAD recommendations for infusion of peripherally compatible infusate were:

  • Peripheral IV catheter: appropriate use ≤5 days with no preference between peripheral IV and ultrasound-guided peripheral IV; neutral/uncertain for 6-14 days; inappropriate for ≥14 days
  • Ultrasound-guided peripheral IV catheter: appropriate use of ultrasound-guided peripheral IV catheter preferred to peripheral IVs if duration is 6-14 days; inappropriate for ≥14 days
  • Nontunneled/acute central venous catheter: appropriate use of central venous catheter preferred in critically ill patients or if hemodynamic monitoring is needed for 6-14 days; inappropriate for ≥14 days
  • Midline catheter: appropriate use of midline catheter preferred to PICC if proposed duration is ≤14 days; inappropriate for longer than 14 days
  • PICC: inappropriate for ≤5 days; appropriate ≥6 days; preferred to midline catheter if proposed duration of infusion is ≥15 days
  • Tunneled catheter or port: inappropriate for ≤30 days; PICC preferred to tunneled catheter and ports for infusion of 15-30 days; appropriate for ≥31 days

VAD recommendations for infusions of non-peripherally compatible infusates were:

  • Peripheral IV catheter and ultrasound-guided peripheral IV catheter: inappropriate all times
  • Nontunneled/acute central venous catheter: appropriate for use ≤14 days; preferred in critically ill patients or if hemodynamic monitoring is needed for 6-14 days; inappropriate ≥15 days
  • Midline catheter: inappropriate for all times
  • PICC: appropriate for all times
  • Tunneled catheter: inappropriate for ≤5 days; neutral for 6-14 days; appropriate with no preference between tunneled catheter and PICC for ≥15 days
  • Port: inappropriate for use for ≤30 days; appropriate with no preference among port, tunneled catheter, or PICC for ≥31 days
 VAD recommendations for patients with difficult venous access:
  • Peripheral IV catheter: appropriate for ≤5 days with no preference between peripheral IV and ultrasound-guided peripheral IV; inappropriate for ≥5 days
  • Ultrasound-guided peripheral IV catheter: appropriate for ≤14 days; preferred over peripheral IV catheter if duration is 6-14 days; inappropriate for ≥15 days
  • Midline catheter: appropriate for 1-14 days; preferred to PICC if duration is ≤14 days; inappropriate for ≥15 days
  • Nontunneled/acute central venous catheter: appropriate for ≤14 days; preferred to PICC for use ≤14 days in critically ill patients; inappropriate for use ≥15 days
  • PICC: disagreement on appropriateness of PICC for use <5 days; appropriate for ≥6 days; preferred to tunneled catheters for 15-30 days
  • Tunneled catheter: inappropriate for use ≤14 days; neutral for use ≥15 days; no preference between tunneled catheter or port for use ≥31 days
  • Port: inappropriate for 1-30 days; appropriate with no preference between tunneled catheter or port for use ≥31 days

VAD recommendations for patients who require frequent phlebotomy:

  • Peripheral IV catheter: appropriate use ≤5 days; no preference between peripheral IV and ultrasound-guided peripheral IV catheter for ≤5 days; inappropriate ≥6 days
  • Ultrasound-guided peripheral IV catheter: appropriate ≤5 days; preferred if venous access difficult; inappropriate ≥6 days
  • Midline catheter: appropriate for ≤14 days; preferred to PICCs if ≤14 days; neutral for 15-30 days; inappropriate ≥31 days
  • Nontunneled/acute central venous catheter: appropriate for ≤14 days; preferred to PICC for use for ≤14 days in critically ill patients; inappropriate ≥15 days
  • PICC: disagreement on appropriateness of PICC for <5 days; appropriate for ≥6 days; preferred to tunneled catheter for 15-30 days
  • Tunneled catheter: inappropriate for ≤14 days; neutral for 15-30 days; appropriate for ≥31 days
  • Port: inappropriate for all times

The panelists acknowledged these tools would not answer every question in every patient scenario, but suggested that these criteria will provide physicians with a tool to reference during a “time-out” to think about VAD decision-making and patient risk factors.

__________________

Source: http://www.medpagetoday.com/HospitalBasedMedicine/Hospitalists/53557

Full article: Chopra V, Flanders SA, Saint S, Woller SC, O’Grady NP, Safdar N, et al. The Michigan Appropriateness Guide for Intravenous Catheters (MAGIC): Results From a Multispecialty Panel Using the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method. Ann Intern Med. 2015;163:S1-S40. doi:10.7326/M15-0744

2 thoughts on “ICYMI: Best Practices for PICC insertion, care and management

  1. I am confused by the comment that it is inappropriate at any time to use a port for a person that needs frequent blood monitoring. I work in a chemo facility and we almost always use the port to draw blood versus a peripheral vein. Please update me on the new rules and why. Thank you.

    • The actual statement from the article is:
      “Ports were rated as inappropriate for frequent obtaining of blood samples at all duration and appropriate for difficult venous access if use for 31 days or more days was expected”.

      The article states the panelist are comparing ports to PICCs so perhaps, they are thinking that PICC is a better choice for this purpose versus ports.

      Thanks for your comment.

Comments are closed.